Challenger Yokohama CH | Cemento | $54.160 – Finali
Court 2 – Ora italiana: 02:30 (ora locale: 10:30 am)
1. [1] Max Purcell 
/ Luke Saville vs [ITF] Moez Echargui 
/ Skander Mansouri
CH Yokohama
Max Purcell / Luke Saville [1]
6
7
7
Moez Echargui / Skander Mansouri
7
6
10
Vincitori: ECHARGUI / MANSOURI
Servizio
Svolgimento
Set 3
M. Echargui / Mansouri
1-0
1-1
1-2
1-3
2-3
2-4
ace
3-4
4-4
5-4
5-5
5-6
6-6
7-6
7-7
8-7
9-7
0-0 → 0-1
Servizio
Svolgimento
Set 2
Tiebreak
0*-0
1-0*
2-0*
2*-1
3*-1
4-1*
4-2*
4*-3
5*-3
6-3*
6-6 → 7-6
M. Echargui / Mansouri
5-6 → 6-6
M. Purcell / Saville
15-0
15-15
15-30
15-40
30-40
5-5 → 5-6
M. Echargui / Mansouri
5-4 → 5-5
M. Purcell / Saville
4-4 → 5-4
M. Echargui / Mansouri
0-15
0-30
15-30
30-30
30-40
3-4 → 4-4
M. Purcell / Saville
2-4 → 3-4
M. Echargui / Mansouri
2-3 → 2-4
M. Purcell / Saville
15-0
15-15
15-30
30-30
40-30
40-40
2-2 → 2-3
M. Echargui / Mansouri
15-0
15-15
30-15
40-15
40-30
40-40
2-1 → 2-2
M. Purcell / Saville
1-1 → 2-1
M. Echargui / Mansouri
15-0
15-15
df
30-15
40-15
1-0 → 1-1
M. Purcell / Saville
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
30-40
ace
40-40
0-0 → 1-0
Servizio
Svolgimento
Set 1
Tiebreak
0-0*
0*-1
1*-1
2-1*
2-2*
2*-3
2*-4
3-4*
4-4*
5*-4
6*-4
6-5*
6-6*
6*-7
6-6 → 6-7
M. Purcell / Saville
5-6 → 6-6
M. Echargui / Mansouri
15-0
15-15
30-15
ace
30-30
30-40
40-40
5-5 → 5-6
M. Purcell / Saville
15-0
15-15
30-15
40-15
40-30
df
40-40
4-5 → 5-5
M. Echargui / Mansouri
15-0
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
4-4 → 4-5
M. Purcell / Saville
0-15
0-30
15-30
30-30
30-40
40-40
3-4 → 4-4
M. Echargui / Mansouri
0-15
0-30
15-30
ace
15-40
df
30-40
40-40
2-4 → 3-4
M. Purcell / Saville
15-0
30-0
30-15
40-15
40-30
df
40-40
df
2-3 → 2-4
M. Echargui / Mansouri
2-2 → 2-3
M. Purcell / Saville
1-2 → 2-2
M. Echargui / Mansouri
1-1 → 1-2
M. Purcell / Saville
15-0
30-0
30-15
df
30-30
40-30
0-1 → 1-1
M. Echargui / Mansouri
0-0 → 0-1
2. [11] Soonwoo Kwon 
vs [2] Oscar Otte 
CH Yokohama
Soonwoo Kwon [11]
7
6
Oscar Otte [2]
6
3
Vincitore: S. KWON
Servizio
Svolgimento
Set 2
S. Kwon
0-15
15-15
30-15
40-15
ace
5-3 → 6-3
S. Kwon
15-0
ace
15-15
15-30
30-30
40-30
ace
4-2 → 5-2
O. Otte
0-15
df
15-15
30-15
40-15
40-30
40-40
A-40
40-40
df
40-A
40-40
40-A
3-2 → 4-2
O. Otte
15-0
15-15
15-30
30-30
40-30
ace
2-1 → 2-2
O. Otte
15-0
30-0
30-15
30-30
40-30
ace
1-0 → 1-1
S. Kwon
0-15
30-15
ace
30-30
40-30
ace
ace
0-0 → 1-0
Servizio
Svolgimento
Set 1
Tiebreak
0-0*
1*-0
2*-0
ace
3-0*
ace
4-0*
5*-0
5*-1
6-1*
ace
6-2*
6*-3
ace
6*-4
6-6 → 7-6
O. Otte
0-15
0-30
15-30
15-40
30-40
A-40
40-40
A-40
ace
5-5 → 5-6
O. Otte
15-0
30-0
40-0
40-15
40-30
3-3 → 3-4
S. Kwon
15-0
15-15
15-30
30-30
40-30
2-3 → 3-3
O. Otte
15-0
30-0
30-15
30-30
40-30
40-40
A-40
ace
2-2 → 2-3
O. Otte
15-0
15-15
df
15-30
30-30
40-30
0-0 → 0-1
Challenger Pau CH | Indoor | e69.280 – Finali
CENTRAL – Ora italiana: 13:00 (ora locale: 1:00 pm)
1. Scott Clayton 
/ Adil Shamasdin 
vs [4] Sander Arends 
/ Tristan-Samuel Weissborn 
CH Pau
Scott Clayton / Adil Shamasdin
7
5
10
Sander Arends / Tristan-Samuel Weissborn [4]
6
7
8
Vincitori: CLAYTON / SHAMASDIN
Servizio
Svolgimento
Set 3
S. Arends / Weissborn
1-0
2-0
2-1
3-1
3-2
3-3
4-3
5-3
df
5-4
6-4
6-5
7-5
7-6
7-7
7-8
8-8
8-9
Servizio
Svolgimento
Set 2
S. Arends / Weissborn
5-6 → 5-7
S. Clayton / Shamasdin
0-15
df
0-30
15-30
15-40
30-40
df
5-5 → 5-6
S. Arends / Weissborn
0-15
15-15
15-30
df
30-30
40-30
5-4 → 5-5
S. Clayton / Shamasdin
0-15
0-30
15-30
30-30
40-30
4-4 → 5-4
S. Arends / Weissborn
15-0
30-0
30-15
40-15
40-30
40-40
4-3 → 4-4
S. Clayton / Shamasdin
3-3 → 4-3
S. Arends / Weissborn
3-2 → 3-3
S. Clayton / Shamasdin
2-2 → 3-2
S. Arends / Weissborn
2-1 → 2-2
S. Clayton / Shamasdin
15-0
15-15
15-30
30-30
40-30
ace
40-40
df
1-1 → 2-1
S. Arends / Weissborn
1-0 → 1-1
S. Clayton / Shamasdin
0-0 → 1-0
Servizio
Svolgimento
Set 1
Tiebreak
0-0*
0*-1
1*-1
2-1*
2-2*
3*-2
4*-2
5-2*
5-3*
5*-4
ace
6*-4
6-6 → 7-6
S. Clayton / Shamasdin
15-0
30-0
30-15
30-30
40-30
40-40
5-6 → 6-6
S. Arends / Weissborn
5-5 → 5-6
S. Clayton / Shamasdin
4-5 → 5-5
S. Arends / Weissborn
15-0
ace
30-0
30-15
40-15
4-4 → 4-5
S. Clayton / Shamasdin
0-15
15-15
ace
30-15
40-15
3-4 → 4-4
S. Arends / Weissborn
15-0
15-15
15-30
30-30
30-40
df
2-4 → 3-4
S. Clayton / Shamasdin
0-15
15-15
15-30
df
30-30
30-40
40-40
1-4 → 2-4
S. Arends / Weissborn
1-3 → 1-4
S. Clayton / Shamasdin
15-0
15-15
df
15-30
df
15-40
1-2 → 1-3
S. Arends / Weissborn
0-15
0-30
15-30
15-40
30-40
40-40
1-1 → 1-2
S. Clayton / Shamasdin
0-1 → 1-1
S. Arends / Weissborn
15-0
15-15
df
15-30
30-30
40-30
0-0 → 0-1
2. [4] Alexander Bublik 
vs Norbert Gombos 
(non prima ore: 15:00)
CH Pau
Alexander Bublik [4]
5
6
6
Norbert Gombos
7
3
3
Vincitore: A. BUBLIK
Servizio
Svolgimento
Set 3
N. Gombos
0-15
0-30
df
15-30
30-30
ace
30-40
5-3 → 6-3
N. Gombos
15-0
15-15
15-30
15-40
30-40
3-3 → 4-3
A. Bublik
15-0
30-0
40-0
40-15
40-30
2-3 → 3-3
N. Gombos
15-0
15-15
15-30
30-30
40-30
ace
2-2 → 2-3
N. Gombos
15-0
15-15
30-15
40-15
40-30
df
1-1 → 1-2
A. Bublik
15-0
15-15
30-15
40-15
40-30
0-1 → 1-1
N. Gombos
0-15
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
0-0 → 0-1
Servizio
Svolgimento
Set 2
A. Bublik
0-15
15-15
ace
30-15
30-30
40-30
ace
4-2 → 5-2
N. Gombos
0-15
df
0-30
df
0-40
15-40
3-2 → 4-2
A. Bublik
15-0
30-0
30-15
df
30-30
40-40
A-40
ace
2-2 → 3-2
A. Bublik
15-0
30-0
40-15
40-30
df
ace
1-1 → 2-1
A. Bublik
0-15
15-15
15-30
30-30
40-30
0-0 → 1-0
Servizio
Svolgimento
Set 1
A. Bublik
0-15
0-30
15-30
15-40
30-40
df
5-5 → 5-6
N. Gombos
15-0
15-15
15-30
30-30
40-30
5-4 → 5-5
N. Gombos
0-15
15-15
15-30
30-30
30-40
40-40
A-40
4-3 → 4-4
A. Bublik
15-0
30-0
30-15
40-15
ace
40-30
3-3 → 4-3
N. Gombos
0-15
15-15
30-15
30-30
30-40
df
40-40
40-A
40-40
40-A
40-40
A-40
3-2 → 3-3
N. Gombos
0-15
15-15
30-15
40-15
ace
2-1 → 2-2
A. Bublik
15-0
30-0
30-15
30-30
40-30
ace
1-1 → 2-1
A. Bublik
15-0
ace
15-15
30-15
ace
30-30
30-40
df
40-40
ace
40-A
df
40-40
A-40
ace
0-0 → 1-0
2 commenti
Sinner
Zverev
Alcaraz
Fritz
Medvedev
Ruud
Djokovic
de Minaur
Dimitrov
Sabalenka
Swiatek
Zheng
Rybakina
Krejcikova
Loading ...
2 commenti
Da sottolineare che a vincere questa settimana sono due classi 97..
Il coreano mi sorprende
Toh, Bublik non avrebbe tantissimo da difendere ad inzio stagione, vuoi vedere che ritorna (almeno) nei 100, come nel 2017?