Risultati dal Roma Garden
Questi i risultati dal torneo challenger di Roma Garden (e42.500 H, terra).
News – Roma
Marco Cecchinato conquista i quarti di finale dopo aver eliminato il giovane
Andrey Rublev, con il risultato di 61 64 in 1 ora e 6 minuti di partita.
Ai quarti affronterà
Adrian Ungur, classe 1985, n.193 ATP.
Vince Potito Starace che accede ai quarti di finale dopo aver battuto per 60 46 76 (2) lo slovacco Andrej Martin, classe 1989, n.179 ATP dopo 2 ore e 7 minuti di partita.
Ai quarti Potito sfiderà proprio Kyle Edmund.
Matteo Berrettini si ferma al secondo turno sconfitto da Kyle Edmund, classe 1995, n.125 ATP, con il risultato di 63 63 in 1 ora e 19 minuti di partita.
Esce di scena al secondo turno Thomas Fabbiano superato per 76 (2) 26 64 dal giapponese Taro Daniel, classe 1993, n.169 ATP.
2° Turno
Centre Court – Ora italiana: 13:00 (ora locale: 13:00)
1. Mate Delic vs [2] Dustin Brown
CH Rome
Mate Delic
2
4
Dustin Brown [2]
6
6
Vincitore: D. BROWN
Servizio
Svolgimento
Set 2
M. Delic
15-15
30-30
40-30
40-40
40-A
4-4 → 4-5
M. Delic
0-15
0-30
0-40
15-40
30-40
40-40
A-40
40-40
A-40
3-3 → 4-3
D. Brown
15-0
30-0
30-15
40-15
40-30
40-40
A-40
3-2 → 3-3
M. Delic
0-15
0-30
15-40
30-40
40-40
A-40
2-2 → 3-2
M. Delic
0-15
0-30
15-30
30-30
40-30
0-0 → 1-0
Servizio
Svolgimento
Set 1
M. Delic
15-0
15-15
15-30
30-30
40-30
1-5 → 2-5
D. Brown
15-0
15-15
30-15
40-15
40-30
0-1 → 0-2
M. Delic
0-15
0-30
15-30
15-40
30-40
0-0 → 0-1
2. Andrej Martin vs Potito Starace
CH Rome
Andrej Martin
0
6
6
Potito Starace
6
4
7
Vincitore: P. STARACE
Servizio
Svolgimento
Set 3
Tiebreak
0-0*
0*-1
1*-1
1-2*
1-3*
1*-4
1*-5
1-6*
2-6*
6-6 → 6-7
P. Starace
0-15
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
40-40
40-30
40-40
A-40
40-A
40-40
A-40
5-5 → 5-6
P. Starace
15-15
30-15
40-15
40-30
40-40
4-4 → 4-5
A. Martin
0-30
15-30
30-30
40-30
40-40
A-40
40-40
40-A
4-3 → 4-4
P. Starace
0-15
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
4-2 → 4-3
P. Starace
15-0
30-0
30-15
30-30
30-40
40-40
A-40
1-1 → 1-2
P. Starace
15-0
15-15
30-15
40-15
40-30
40-40
A-40
40-40
A-40
40-40
40-A
0-0 → 1-0
Servizio
Svolgimento
Set 2
A. Martin
15-0
30-0
30-15
40-15
40-30
5-4 → 6-4
A. Martin
15-0
40-0
40-15
40-0
40-15
3-2 → 4-2
P. Starace
0-15
0-30
0-40
15-40
30-40
40-40
A-40
1-1 → 1-2
P. Starace
0-15
0-30
15-30
30-30
40-30
0-0 → 0-1
Servizio
Svolgimento
Set 1
A. Martin
0-15
15-15
30-15
30-30
30-40
0-5 → 0-6
P. Starace
15-0
30-0
30-15
30-30
30-40
40-40
A-40
40-40
A-40
0-4 → 0-5
A. Martin
0-15
0-30
15-30
30-30
30-40
40-40
A-40
40-40
40-A
40-40
40-A
0-3 → 0-4
P. Starace
15-0
30-0
40-0
40-15
40-30
0-2 → 0-3
P. Starace
15-0
30-0
40-0
40-15
40-30
0-0 → 0-1
02:06:05 3 Aces 0
5 Double Faults 1
58% 1st Serve % 67%
32/49 (65%) 1st Serve Points Won 42/72 (58%)
16/35 (46%) 2nd Serve Points Won 21/36 (58%)
2/7 (29%) Break Points Saved 6/9 (67%)
14 Service Games Played 14
30/72 (42%) 1st Return Points Won 17/49 (35%)
15/36 (42%) 2nd Return Points Won 19/35 (54%)
3/9 (33%) Break Points Won 5/7 (71%)
14 Return Games Played 14
48/84 (57%) Total Service Points Won 63/108 (58%)
45/108 (42%) Total Return Points Won 36/84 (43%)
93/192 (48%) Total Points Won 99/192 (52%)
3. [5/WC] Marco Cecchinato vs [WC] Andrey Rublev
CH Rome
Marco Cecchinato [5]
6
6
Andrey Rublev
1
4
Vincitore: M. CECCHINATO
Servizio
Svolgimento
Set 2
M. Cecchinato
15-0
30-0
40-0
40-15
40-30
5-4 → 6-4
A. Rublev
15-0
15-15
15-30
30-30
40-30
5-3 → 5-4
M. Cecchinato
15-0
30-0
40-0
40-15
40-30
4-3 → 5-3
A. Rublev
0-15
0-30
15-30
15-40
30-40
3-3 → 4-3
M. Cecchinato
15-0
30-0
30-15
30-30
30-40
40-40
A-40
2-3 → 3-3
A. Rublev
15-0
15-15
15-30
15-40
30-40
40-40
40-A
40-40
A-40
1-1 → 1-2
M. Cecchinato
0-15
0-30
15-30
30-30
40-30
0-1 → 1-1
Servizio
Svolgimento
Set 1
A. Rublev
0-15
0-30
15-40
30-40
40-40
40-A
4-1 → 5-1
A. Rublev
15-0
30-0
30-15
40-15
40-30
40-40
40-A
2-1 → 3-1
M. Cecchinato
15-0
30-0
40-0
40-15
40-30
1-1 → 2-1
A. Rublev
15-0
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
1-0 → 1-1
01:05:14 2 Aces 2
1 Double Faults 0
57% 1st Serve % 72%
21/29 (72%) 1st Serve Points Won 24/38 (63%)
16/22 (73%) 2nd Serve Points Won 6/15 (40%)
1/1 (100%) Break Points Saved 6/9 (67%)
9 Service Games Played 8
14/38 (37%) 1st Return Points Won 8/29 (28%)
9/15 (60%) 2nd Return Points Won 6/22 (27%)
3/9 (33%) Break Points Won 0/1 (0%)
8 Return Games Played 9
37/51 (73%) Total Service Points Won 30/53 (57%)
23/53 (43%) Total Return Points Won 14/51 (27%)
60/104 (58%) Total Points Won 44/104 (42%)
4. [1] Dustin Brown / Frantisek Cermak vs Andrea Arnaboldi / Flavio Cipolla
CH Rome
Dustin Brown / Frantisek Cermak [1]
3
4
Andrea Arnaboldi / Flavio Cipolla
6
6
Vincitori: BAI / LI
Servizio
Svolgimento
Set 2
A. Arnaboldi / Cipolla
0-15
0-30
15-30
30-30
40-30
4-5 → 4-6
D. Brown / Cermak
15-0
15-15
30-15
40-15
40-30
40-40
3-5 → 4-5
A. Arnaboldi / Cipolla
3-4 → 3-5
D. Brown / Cermak
3-3 → 3-4
A. Arnaboldi / Cipolla
3-2 → 3-3
D. Brown / Cermak
0-15
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
2-2 → 3-2
A. Arnaboldi / Cipolla
0-15
0-30
0-40
15-40
30-40
1-2 → 2-2
D. Brown / Cermak
0-2 → 1-2
A. Arnaboldi / Cipolla
0-15
0-30
15-30
30-30
30-40
df
40-40
0-1 → 0-2
D. Brown / Cermak
0-15
df
0-30
0-40
15-40
30-40
0-0 → 0-1
Servizio
Svolgimento
Set 1
A. Arnaboldi / Cipolla
3-5 → 3-6
D. Brown / Cermak
15-0
30-0
30-15
40-15
40-30
2-5 → 3-5
A. Arnaboldi / Cipolla
2-4 → 2-5
D. Brown / Cermak
0-15
0-30
df
15-30
30-30
40-30
1-4 → 2-4
A. Arnaboldi / Cipolla
1-3 → 1-4
D. Brown / Cermak
0-3 → 1-3
A. Arnaboldi / Cipolla
0-15
15-15
15-30
30-30
40-30
40-40
0-2 → 0-3
D. Brown / Cermak
15-0
15-15
15-30
15-40
df
30-40
df
0-1 → 0-2
A. Arnaboldi / Cipolla
0-15
0-30
15-30
30-30
40-30
40-40
df
0-0 → 0-1
COURT 3 – Ora italiana: 13:00 (ora locale: 13:00)
1. [8] Elias Ymer vs [SE] Adam Pavlasek
CH Rome
Elias Ymer [8]
2
4
Adam Pavlasek
6
6
Vincitore: A. PAVLASEK
Servizio
Svolgimento
Set 2
E. Ymer
15-0
30-0
40-0
40-15
40-30
40-40
40-A
4-5 → 4-6
A. Pavlasek
15-0
15-15
15-30
30-30
40-30
4-4 → 4-5
E. Ymer
15-15
30-30
30-40
40-40
A-40
3-2 → 4-2
E. Ymer
0-15
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
40-40
A-40
40-40
A-40
1-0 → 2-0
A. Pavlasek
0-15
0-30
15-30
15-40
30-40
0-0 → 1-0
Servizio
Svolgimento
Set 1
E. Ymer
15-0
30-0
40-0
40-15
40-30
40-40
40-A
2-5 → 2-6
E. Ymer
15-0
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
1-2 → 2-2
A. Pavlasek
0-15
15-15
15-30
30-30
30-40
0-2 → 1-2
2. [4] Kyle Edmund vs [Q] Matteo Berrettini
CH Rome
Kyle Edmund [4]
6
6
Matteo Berrettini
3
3
Vincitore: K. EDMUND
Servizio
Svolgimento
Set 2
M. Berrettini
0-15
0-30
15-30
40-30
40-40
40-A
5-3 → 6-3
K. Edmund
0-15
0-30
15-30
30-30
40-30
4-3 → 5-3
K. Edmund
15-0
30-0
40-0
40-15
40-30
2-3 → 3-3
M. Berrettini
0-15
15-15
15-30
30-30
40-30
1-1 → 1-2
M. Berrettini
15-0
30-0
40-0
40-15
40-30
0-0 → 0-1
Servizio
Svolgimento
Set 1
K. Edmund
0-15
0-30
15-30
15-40
30-40
40-40
A-40
5-3 → 6-3
M. Berrettini
15-0
15-15
15-30
30-30
30-40
4-3 → 5-3
M. Berrettini
15-0
30-0
30-15
30-30
40-30
40-40
A-40
3-2 → 3-3
K. Edmund
15-0
30-0
40-0
40-15
40-30
40-15
40-30
2-2 → 3-2
M. Berrettini
0-15
15-15
15-30
30-30
40-30
40-40
A-40
1-0 → 1-1
01:18:25 2 Aces 2
1 Double Faults 1
54% 1st Serve % 57%
20/27 (74%) 1st Serve Points Won 20/33 (61%)
17/23 (74%) 2nd Serve Points Won 12/25 (48%)
2/2 (100%) Break Points Saved 1/4 (25%)
9 Service Games Played 9
13/33 (39%) 1st Return Points Won 7/27 (26%)
13/25 (52%) 2nd Return Points Won 6/23 (26%)
3/4 (75%) Break Points Won 0/2 (0%)
9 Return Games Played 9
37/50 (74%) Total Service Points Won 32/58 (55%)
26/58 (45%) Total Return Points Won 13/50 (26%)
63/108 (58%) Total Points Won 45/108 (42%)
3. Thomas Fabbiano vs [6] Taro Daniel
CH Rome
Thomas Fabbiano
6
6
4
Taro Daniel [6]
7
2
6
Vincitore: T. DANIEL
Servizio
Svolgimento
Set 3
T. Fabbiano
0-15
0-30
15-30
30-30
30-40
4-5 → 4-6
T. Daniel
0-15
15-15
30-15
30-30
30-40
3-5 → 4-5
T. Fabbiano
0-15
0-30
15-30
30-30
30-40
40-40
A-40
40-40
2-3 → 3-3
T. Fabbiano
0-15
15-15
30-15
40-15
40-30
40-40
40-A
40-40
40-A
40-40
A-40
1-2 → 2-2
T. Fabbiano
15-15
30-15
30-30
30-40
40-40
A-40
40-40
A-40
40-40
A-40
40-40
0-1 → 1-1
Servizio
Svolgimento
Set 2
T. Daniel
15-0
15-15
30-15
30-30
30-40
4-2 → 5-2
T. Fabbiano
15-0
15-15
30-15
30-30
30-40
40-40
A-40
3-2 → 4-2
T. Fabbiano
0-15
0-30
0-40
15-40
30-40
2-1 → 2-2
T. Daniel
15-0
30-0
30-15
30-30
40-30
2-0 → 2-1
T. Fabbiano
0-15
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
1-0 → 2-0
T. Daniel
15-0
15-15
30-15
30-30
30-40
40-40
40-A
0-0 → 1-0
Servizio
Svolgimento
Set 1
Tiebreak
0*-0
0-1*
0-2*
0*-3
0*-4
1-4*
1-5*
2*-5
2*-6
6-6 → 6-7
T. Fabbiano
15-0
30-0
30-15
30-30
30-40
40-40
40-A
5-5 → 5-6
T. Daniel
15-0
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
5-4 → 5-5
T. Fabbiano
15-0
30-0
30-15
30-30
40-30
40-40
A-40
40-40
A-40
4-4 → 5-4
T. Daniel
15-0
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
4-3 → 4-4
T. Fabbiano
15-0
15-15
15-30
15-15
15-30
15-40
30-40
40-40
40-A
40-40
A-40
3-1 → 4-1
T. Daniel
15-0
15-15
30-15
30-30
30-40
1-0 → 2-0
T. Fabbiano
15-0
15-15
15-30
30-30
40-30
0-0 → 1-0
02:23:00 5 Aces 1
2 Double Faults 5
67% 1st Serve % 66%
42/78 (54%) 1st Serve Points Won 38/57 (67%)
20/38 (53%) 2nd Serve Points Won 12/30 (40%)
11/16 (69%) Break Points Saved 1/7 (14%)
15 Service Games Played 15
19/57 (33%) 1st Return Points Won 36/78 (46%)
18/30 (60%) 2nd Return Points Won 18/38 (47%)
6/7 (86%) Break Points Won 5/16 (31%)
15 Return Games Played 15
62/116 (53%) Total Service Points Won 50/87 (57%)
37/87 (43%) Total Return Points Won 54/116 (47%)
99/203 (49%) Total Points Won 104/203 (51%)
COURT 4 – Ora italiana: 13:00 (ora locale: 13:00)
1. Patrick Grigoriu / Costin Paval vs Andres Molteni / Marco Trungelliti
CH Rome
Patrick Grigoriu / Costin Paval
2
6
2
Andres Molteni / Marco Trungelliti
6
2
10
Vincitori: MOLTENI / TRUNGELLITI
Servizio
Svolgimento
Set 3
P. Grigoriu / Paval
0-1
0-2
1-2
1-3
1-4
1-5
1-6
2-6
2-7
2-9
0-0 → 0-1
Servizio
Svolgimento
Set 2
A. Molteni / Trungelliti
15-15
15-40
15-30
15-40
40-40
5-2 → 6-2
P. Grigoriu / Paval
15-0
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
40-40
4-2 → 5-2
A. Molteni / Trungelliti
4-1 → 4-2
P. Grigoriu / Paval
0-15
0-30
0-40
15-40
30-40
40-40
3-1 → 4-1
A. Molteni / Trungelliti
15-0
30-0
30-15
40-15
40-30
3-0 → 3-1
P. Grigoriu / Paval
2-0 → 3-0
A. Molteni / Trungelliti
0-15
15-15
15-30
30-30
30-40
1-0 → 2-0
P. Grigoriu / Paval
0-0 → 1-0
Servizio
Svolgimento
Set 1
A. Molteni / Trungelliti
15-0
30-0
30-15
30-30
40-30
2-5 → 2-6
P. Grigoriu / Paval
0-15
0-30
15-30
15-40
30-40
15-40
30-40
40-40
2-4 → 2-5
A. Molteni / Trungelliti
2-3 → 2-4
P. Grigoriu / Paval
1-3 → 2-3
A. Molteni / Trungelliti
15-0
15-15
15-30
30-30
40-30
1-2 → 1-3
P. Grigoriu / Paval
1-1 → 1-2
A. Molteni / Trungelliti
1-0 → 1-1
P. Grigoriu / Paval
15-0
30-15
30-30
40-30
40-40
0-0 → 1-0
2. [1] Aljaz Bedene vs Maxime Authom (non prima ore: 14:00)
CH Rome
Aljaz Bedene [1]
6
6
Maxime Authom
1
2
Vincitore: A. BEDENE
Servizio
Svolgimento
Set 2
A. Bedene
0-15
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
40-40
A-40
5-2 → 6-2
M. Authom
15-0
15-15
30-15
30-30
30-40
A-40
5-1 → 5-2
M. Authom
0-15
0-30
15-30
30-30
40-30
40-40
40-A
3-1 → 4-1
A. Bedene
0-15
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
2-1 → 3-1
A. Bedene
0-15
15-15
15-30
30-30
40-30
1-0 → 2-0
M. Authom
15-0
15-15
15-30
15-40
30-40
40-40
40-A
0-0 → 1-0
Servizio
Svolgimento
Set 1
M. Authom
0-15
15-30
15-40
15-30
15-40
30-40
40-40
A-40
40-40
40-A
4-1 → 5-1
A. Bedene
15-0
30-0
30-15
30-30
40-30
2-0 → 3-0
M. Authom
0-15
0-30
15-30
30-30
30-40
1-0 → 2-0
A. Bedene
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-40
A-40
0-0 → 1-0
3. [Q] Pedro Cachin vs Adrian Ungur
CH Rome
Pedro Cachin
3
4
Adrian Ungur
6
6
Vincitore: A. UNGUR
Servizio
Svolgimento
Set 2
P. Cachin
15-0
15-15
15-30
30-30
30-40
4-4 → 4-5
A. Ungur
0-15
0-30
15-30
30-30
40-30
40-40
A-40
4-3 → 4-4
A. Ungur
A-40
40-40
40-A
40-40
40-A
2-3 → 3-3
A. Ungur
15-0
30-0
30-15
30-30
30-40
40-40
40-A
40-40
A-40
40-40
A-40
2-3 → 2-4
P. Cachin
15-0
15-15
30-15
40-15
40-30
1-3 → 2-3
P. Cachin
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
30-40
40-40
40-A
40-40
40-A
1-1 → 1-2
A. Ungur
15-0
30-0
30-15
30-30
40-30
40-40
A-40
1-0 → 1-1
P. Cachin
0-15
0-30
15-30
30-30
30-40
40-40
A-40
40-40
A-40
0-0 → 1-0
Servizio
Svolgimento
Set 1
A. Ungur
0-15
15-15
15-30
30-30
30-40
40-40
40-A
40-40
A-40
2-4 → 2-5
P. Cachin
15-0
30-0
30-15
30-0
30-15
40-15
1-4 → 2-4
P. Cachin
0-15
0-30
15-30
30-30
30-40
40-40
A-40
0-1 → 1-1
COURT 1 – Ora italiana: 14:00 (ora locale: 14:00)
1. Dino Marcan / Antonio Sancic vs [2] Gero Kretschmer / Alexander Satschko
CH Rome
Dino Marcan / Antonio Sancic
5
6
10
Gero Kretschmer / Alexander Satschko [2]
7
4
6
Vincitori: MARCAN / SANCIC
Servizio
Svolgimento
Set 3
D. Marcan / Sancic
0-1
0-3
1-3
2-3
3-3
4-3
4-4
5-4
5-5
5-6
6-6
7-6
8-6
9-6
Servizio
Svolgimento
Set 2
G. Kretschmer / Satschko
5-4 → 6-4
D. Marcan / Sancic
0-15
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
4-4 → 5-4
G. Kretschmer / Satschko
15-0
30-0
40-0
40-15
40-30
40-40
3-4 → 4-4
D. Marcan / Sancic
3-3 → 3-4
G. Kretschmer / Satschko
0-15
0-30
15-30
30-30
40-30
3-2 → 3-3
D. Marcan / Sancic
0-15
15-15
15-30
30-30
40-30
40-40
2-2 → 3-2
G. Kretschmer / Satschko
2-1 → 2-2
D. Marcan / Sancic
1-1 → 2-1
G. Kretschmer / Satschko
1-0 → 1-1
D. Marcan / Sancic
0-15
15-15
30-15
40-15
40-30
0-0 → 1-0
Servizio
Svolgimento
Set 1
G. Kretschmer / Satschko
15-0
30-0
30-15
30-30
40-30
5-6 → 5-7
D. Marcan / Sancic
0-15
0-30
15-30
30-30
30-40
5-5 → 5-6
G. Kretschmer / Satschko
15-0
15-15
30-15
40-15
40-30
5-4 → 5-5
D. Marcan / Sancic
15-0
15-15
15-0
15-15
15-30
30-30
40-40
5-3 → 5-4
G. Kretschmer / Satschko
5-2 → 5-3
D. Marcan / Sancic
4-2 → 5-2
G. Kretschmer / Satschko
4-1 → 4-2
D. Marcan / Sancic
0-15
0-30
0-40
15-40
30-40
40-40
3-1 → 4-1
G. Kretschmer / Satschko
3-0 → 3-1
D. Marcan / Sancic
15-0
15-15
30-15
40-15
40-30
2-0 → 3-0
G. Kretschmer / Satschko
0-15
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
40-40
1-0 → 2-0
D. Marcan / Sancic
0-0 → 1-0
2. [3] Wesley Koolhof / Matwe Middelkoop vs Aljaz Bedene / David Rice
CH Rome
Wesley Koolhof / Matwe Middelkoop [3]
5
6
10
Aljaz Bedene / David Rice
7
3
8
Vincitori: KOOLHOF / MIDDELKOOP
Servizio
Svolgimento
Set 3
W. Koolhof / Middelkoop
1-0
1-1
2-1
2-2
2-3
3-3
3-4
3-5
3-6
4-6
5-6
6-6
7-6
8-6
9-6
9-7
9-8
0-0 → 1-0
Servizio
Svolgimento
Set 2
W. Koolhof / Middelkoop
5-3 → 6-3
A. Bedene / Rice
4-3 → 5-3
W. Koolhof / Middelkoop
4-2 → 4-3
A. Bedene / Rice
15-0
15-15
30-30
15-15
30-30
30-40
40-40
3-2 → 4-2
W. Koolhof / Middelkoop
3-1 → 3-2
A. Bedene / Rice
2-1 → 3-1
W. Koolhof / Middelkoop
0-15
15-15
15-30
30-30
30-40
40-40
1-1 → 2-1
A. Bedene / Rice
15-0
30-0
30-15
30-30
40-30
40-40
1-0 → 1-1
W. Koolhof / Middelkoop
0-0 → 1-0
Servizio
Svolgimento
Set 1
A. Bedene / Rice
0-15
0-30
0-15
0-30
15-30
30-30
40-30
5-6 → 5-7
W. Koolhof / Middelkoop
5-5 → 5-6
A. Bedene / Rice
5-4 → 5-5
W. Koolhof / Middelkoop
4-4 → 5-4
A. Bedene / Rice
4-3 → 4-4
W. Koolhof / Middelkoop
3-3 → 4-3
A. Bedene / Rice
3-2 → 3-3
W. Koolhof / Middelkoop
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
30-40
40-40
2-2 → 3-2
A. Bedene / Rice
2-1 → 2-2
W. Koolhof / Middelkoop
15-0
15-15
30-15
40-15
40-30
1-1 → 2-1
A. Bedene / Rice
1-0 → 1-1
W. Koolhof / Middelkoop
0-0 → 1-0
Ma Pellegrino si è qualificato?
cancellato!
@ Forza ceck (#1334650)
allora io ho concrete possibilità di entrare nei cento 🙂
Semplice: Verdasco veniva da un lungo viaggio intercontinentale ed ha sciolto! Fognini meglio stendere un velo per come abbia ceduto un set. Se essere realisti vuol dire essere provicialotti ok! Per me è più provinciale l’esterofilo ad ogni costo con fette di prosciutto allegate. A ben vedere il provinciale direbbero i sociologi non è mai soddisfatto del proprio contesto e vuole evadere!
Cecchinato aspetto che faccia ora qualche risultato anche all’ estero!!!
Che giornatina che mi son perso oggi…mi devo rifare domani, anche se sono terribilmente indeciso se andare al foro oppure qui.
Tra l’altro questa partita è la chiara testimonianza che talvolta giocare nei tornei “prestigiosi” ed incontrare giocatori con un ranking molto alto ma poco attenti o fuori forma può essere molto più facile piuttosto che trovarsi di fronte dei mestieranti pronti a tutto.
Cecchinato diventerà un top ten tra 1 anno
Peccato per Thomas 😕